8e372dd8ed
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
63 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
63 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
phase: 10.1-aggressive-workflow-modularization
|
|
task: 0
|
|
total_tasks: 0
|
|
status: context_gathered
|
|
last_updated: 2026-02-04
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
<current_state>
|
|
Phase 10.1 context discussion completed. CONTEXT.md created with implementation decisions. Phase has no plans yet — ready for `/gsd:plan-phase 10.1` to create execution plans.
|
|
</current_state>
|
|
|
|
<completed_work>
|
|
- Phase 10 fully complete (7 plans, all UAT gaps closed)
|
|
- Phase 10.1 CONTEXT.md created via `/gsd:discuss-phase`
|
|
- Fixed misnamed phase directories (10.1 and 10.2 were swapped)
|
|
- Committed: `docs(10.1): capture phase context`
|
|
</completed_work>
|
|
|
|
<remaining_work>
|
|
- Run `/gsd:plan-phase 10.1` to create execution plans
|
|
- Execute plans to decompose main workflow from 192 nodes to ~50-80 nodes
|
|
- Create domain sub-workflows per the captured decisions
|
|
</remaining_work>
|
|
|
|
<decisions_made>
|
|
**Decomposition:**
|
|
- Claude proposes optimal boundaries, user approves
|
|
- Extraction threshold: cohesive behavior + 8-15 nodes minimum
|
|
- Existing sub-workflows (Update, Actions, Logs) open to restructuring
|
|
|
|
**Main workflow:**
|
|
- Main sends all Telegram responses (sub-workflows return data only)
|
|
- Centralized error handling in main
|
|
- Claude to evaluate whether dedicated Telegram sub-workflow adds value
|
|
|
|
**Contracts:**
|
|
- Input: common fields (chatId, messageId) + domain-specific
|
|
- File naming: `n8n-{domain}.json` (rename existing to match)
|
|
|
|
**Migration:**
|
|
- Grouped extraction, verify each group
|
|
- Telegram sub-workflow first if validated
|
|
- Git + backup files for rollback
|
|
</decisions_made>
|
|
|
|
<blockers>
|
|
None
|
|
</blockers>
|
|
|
|
<context>
|
|
User wants pragmatic modularization — no workflow too large to work with, logical groupings, don't over-engineer. Key insight from discussion: a dedicated Telegram sub-workflow could centralize all messaging complexity (sending, editing, keyboards, errors, callbacks). This needs validation during research/planning.
|
|
|
|
The goal is main workflow becomes: trigger → auth → route → dispatch to sub-workflows → format response → send via Telegram (or Telegram sub-workflow).
|
|
</context>
|
|
|
|
<next_action>
|
|
Run `/gsd:plan-phase 10.1` to:
|
|
1. Research current workflow structure
|
|
2. Propose domain boundaries (including Telegram sub-workflow evaluation)
|
|
3. Create execution plans for grouped extraction
|
|
</next_action>
|