- CAL-14 preserve: UPDATE with no reminderLeadMinutes preserves VALARM from rawVevent - CAL-13 timed: CREATE with reminderLeadMinutes=15 emits TRIGGER:-PT15M - CAL-13 clear: UPDATE with reminderLeadMinutes=null emits no VALARM (passes trivially) - CAL-13 all-day: CREATE with allDay=true and reminderLeadMinutes=1440 emits VALUE=DATE-TIME
1021 lines
41 KiB
TypeScript
1021 lines
41 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* broker/outboxWorker.ts — outbox state machine (D-04, D-07, D-08)
|
|
*
|
|
* Behaviors under test:
|
|
* 1. runOutboxDrain transitions pending→done on mock 204 response
|
|
* 2. runOutboxDrain transitions pending→failed on mock 412 (conflict, no retry), triggers re-sync
|
|
* 3. runOutboxDrain transitions pending→backoff (nextAttemptAt advanced, attemptCount++)
|
|
* on mock 500 (transient error)
|
|
* 4. runOutboxDrain transitions pending→dead when attemptCount reaches MAX_ATTEMPTS
|
|
* 5. Edit-as-move (D-04): create row processed BEFORE the linked delete row (groupId)
|
|
* 6. scheduleOutboxDrain trigger wiring (D-09): signal → prompt drain, trailing re-drain collapse
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach, beforeAll, afterAll } from 'vitest';
|
|
|
|
import {
|
|
runOutboxDrain,
|
|
assembleRruleString,
|
|
scheduleOutboxDrain,
|
|
initOutboxTrigger,
|
|
stopOutboxTrigger,
|
|
__resetDrainState,
|
|
} from '../../src/broker/outboxWorker.js';
|
|
import { signalOutboxDrain } from '../../src/lib/outboxTrigger.js';
|
|
|
|
// ── Drizzle DB mock ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
// Follows the pattern from PATTERNS.md §Drizzle DB mock in tests.
|
|
//
|
|
// vi.hoisted() is required for variables referenced inside vi.mock() factories.
|
|
// vi.mock() is hoisted to the top of the file by vitest's transform; without
|
|
// vi.hoisted(), variables declared with const/let are in the TDZ when the factory
|
|
// runs (static imports trigger module loading before declarations are evaluated).
|
|
|
|
const {
|
|
mockUpdateSet,
|
|
mockUpdate,
|
|
mockWherePending,
|
|
mockWhereCalEvents,
|
|
mockFromFn,
|
|
mockSelectFn,
|
|
mockDecryptPassword,
|
|
} = vi.hoisted(() => {
|
|
const mockUpdateSet = vi.fn().mockReturnValue({ where: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined) });
|
|
const mockUpdate = vi.fn().mockReturnValue({ set: mockUpdateSet });
|
|
// mockWherePending: terminal node for calendarOutbox selects (pending-rows + sibling-status)
|
|
// db.select().from(calendarOutbox).where(...) — resolves to the row array
|
|
const mockWherePending = vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => Promise.resolve([] as unknown[]));
|
|
// mockWhereCalEvents: terminal node for calendarEvents selects (etag re-read for WR-02)
|
|
// db.select({etag}).from(calendarEvents).where(...) — resolves to the etag array
|
|
const mockWhereCalEvents = vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => Promise.resolve([] as unknown[]));
|
|
const mockFromFn = vi.fn().mockReturnValue({ where: mockWherePending });
|
|
const mockSelectFn = vi.fn().mockReturnValue({ from: mockFromFn });
|
|
// By default returns a dummy password so loadClientForUser succeeds
|
|
const mockDecryptPassword = vi.fn().mockReturnValue('app-password');
|
|
return {
|
|
mockUpdateSet,
|
|
mockUpdate,
|
|
mockWherePending,
|
|
mockWhereCalEvents,
|
|
mockFromFn,
|
|
mockSelectFn,
|
|
mockDecryptPassword,
|
|
};
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
let mockPendingRows: unknown[] = [];
|
|
|
|
// Fake credential row returned by loadClientForUser's db.select().from(memberCredentials).where()
|
|
const FAKE_CRED_ROW = {
|
|
userId: 42,
|
|
fastmailEmail: 'test@fastmail.com',
|
|
encryptedPassword: '{"iv":"aa","authTag":"bb","ciphertext":"cc"}',
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
vi.mock('../../src/db/client.js', () => ({
|
|
db: {
|
|
select: mockSelectFn,
|
|
update: mockUpdate,
|
|
},
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Mock write functions — these are called by outboxWorker for the actual CalDAV ops
|
|
vi.mock('../../src/broker/write.js', () => ({
|
|
createCalendarEvent: vi.fn(),
|
|
updateCalendarEvent: vi.fn(),
|
|
deleteCalendarEvent: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Mock sync — called after successful write (D-06)
|
|
vi.mock('../../src/broker/sync.js', () => ({
|
|
syncCalendar: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Mock client creation — the worker needs a DAVClient to call sync
|
|
vi.mock('../../src/broker/client.js', () => ({
|
|
createFastmailClient: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
|
|
fetchCalendars: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]),
|
|
}),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Mock crypto — controls whether loadClientForUser succeeds or throws (CR-03 tests)
|
|
vi.mock('../../src/broker/crypto.js', () => ({
|
|
decryptPassword: mockDecryptPassword,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
// Default payload is form JSON (the worker must build ICS from this — not pass raw JSON to CalDAV)
|
|
const DEFAULT_FORM_PAYLOAD = JSON.stringify({
|
|
title: 'Lunch',
|
|
allDay: false,
|
|
start: '2026-06-10T12:00:00',
|
|
end: '2026-06-10T13:00:00',
|
|
recurrence: 'none',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const makeRow = (overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) => ({
|
|
id: 1,
|
|
userId: 42,
|
|
operation: 'create' as const,
|
|
status: 'pending' as const,
|
|
uid: 'test-uid@familysync',
|
|
calendarUrl: 'https://caldav.fastmail.com/dav/calendars/user/test@fm.com/Default/',
|
|
calendarObjectUrl: null,
|
|
etag: null,
|
|
payload: DEFAULT_FORM_PAYLOAD,
|
|
attemptCount: 0,
|
|
nextAttemptAt: new Date(Date.now() - 5000), // already due
|
|
lastError: null,
|
|
groupId: null,
|
|
createdAt: new Date(),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const makeResponse = (status: number): Response =>
|
|
({ status, ok: status >= 200 && status < 300, headers: new Headers() }) as unknown as Response;
|
|
|
|
// Helper: wire db mock so outbox queries return mockPendingRows and credential queries return FAKE_CRED_ROW
|
|
// This is called in each beforeEach after vi.clearAllMocks() to restore the mock chain.
|
|
function wireMockChain() {
|
|
mockUpdateSet.mockReturnValue({ where: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined) });
|
|
mockUpdate.mockReturnValue({ set: mockUpdateSet });
|
|
// mockFromFn differentiates by table argument using Symbol.for('drizzle:Name'):
|
|
// - memberCredentials → returns FAKE_CRED_ROW (so loadClientForUser succeeds by default)
|
|
// - calendarEvents → returns mockWhereCalEvents (etag re-read for WR-02)
|
|
// - calendarOutbox (and anything else) → returns mockWherePending (pending-rows + sibling-status)
|
|
// JSON.stringify throws on circular Drizzle table structures; use Symbol identity instead.
|
|
mockFromFn.mockImplementation((table: unknown) => {
|
|
const tableName = (table as Record<symbol, string>)[Symbol.for('drizzle:Name')] ?? '';
|
|
if (tableName === 'member_credentials') {
|
|
return { where: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([FAKE_CRED_ROW]) };
|
|
}
|
|
if (tableName === 'calendar_events') {
|
|
// CR-02: the freshest-etag re-read now scopes to the writing member's calendar:
|
|
// .from(calendarEvents).innerJoin(calendars, ...).where(...).limit(1)
|
|
// mockWhereCalEvents stays the awaited terminal (returned by .limit) so existing
|
|
// mockWhereCalEvents.mockResolvedValue([{ etag }]) overrides still drive the etag.
|
|
return {
|
|
innerJoin: vi.fn().mockReturnValue({
|
|
where: vi.fn().mockReturnValue({ limit: mockWhereCalEvents }),
|
|
}),
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
return { where: mockWherePending };
|
|
});
|
|
mockWhereCalEvents.mockImplementation(() => Promise.resolve([]));
|
|
mockWherePending.mockImplementation(() => Promise.resolve(mockPendingRows));
|
|
mockSelectFn.mockReturnValue({ from: mockFromFn });
|
|
// Default: decryptPassword succeeds
|
|
mockDecryptPassword.mockReturnValue('app-password');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe('runOutboxDrain — state transitions', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
|
mockPendingRows = [];
|
|
wireMockChain();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('transitions pending→done on 204 response and triggers re-sync (D-06)', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockResolvedValue(makeResponse(204));
|
|
mockPendingRows = [makeRow()];
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
// Must update status to 'done'
|
|
expect(mockUpdate).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
const setArg = mockUpdateSet.mock.calls[0]?.[0] as { status?: string };
|
|
expect(setArg?.status).toBe('done');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('transitions pending→failed on 412 (conflict — no retry), marks failed (D-08)', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockResolvedValue(makeResponse(412));
|
|
mockPendingRows = [makeRow()];
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
// 412 = hard fail (conflict) — must NOT retry, must mark failed
|
|
const setArg = mockUpdateSet.mock.calls[0]?.[0] as { status?: string; lastError?: string };
|
|
expect(setArg?.status).toBe('failed');
|
|
expect(setArg?.lastError).toBeTruthy();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('transitions pending→backoff (attemptCount++, nextAttemptAt advanced) on 500 (transient)', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockResolvedValue(makeResponse(500));
|
|
const row = makeRow({ attemptCount: 0 });
|
|
mockPendingRows = [row];
|
|
|
|
const beforeDrain = Date.now();
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
// Must NOT transition to done or failed — backoff
|
|
const setArg = mockUpdateSet.mock.calls[0]?.[0] as {
|
|
status?: string;
|
|
attemptCount?: number;
|
|
nextAttemptAt?: Date;
|
|
};
|
|
expect(setArg?.status).not.toBe('done');
|
|
expect(setArg?.status).not.toBe('failed');
|
|
expect(setArg?.attemptCount).toBe(1);
|
|
// nextAttemptAt must be in the future
|
|
expect(setArg?.nextAttemptAt?.getTime()).toBeGreaterThan(beforeDrain);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('transitions pending→dead when attemptCount reaches MAX_ATTEMPTS on transient error', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockResolvedValue(makeResponse(500));
|
|
// MAX_ATTEMPTS is 5 per RESEARCH.md Pattern 4 — at attempt 4 (0-indexed) → dead
|
|
const row = makeRow({ attemptCount: 4 });
|
|
mockPendingRows = [row];
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
const setArg = mockUpdateSet.mock.calls[0]?.[0] as { status?: string };
|
|
expect(setArg?.status).toBe('dead');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('does not crash when pending rows list is empty', async () => {
|
|
mockPendingRows = [];
|
|
await expect(runOutboxDrain()).resolves.not.toThrow();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('runOutboxDrain — ICS building from form JSON (CR-02)', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
|
mockPendingRows = [];
|
|
wireMockChain();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('create row: icsString passed to createCalendarEvent starts with BEGIN:VCALENDAR and contains SUMMARY', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
let capturedIcsString: unknown = null;
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockImplementation(async (_client, _cal, _uid, icsString) => {
|
|
capturedIcsString = icsString;
|
|
return makeResponse(201);
|
|
});
|
|
mockPendingRows = [makeRow()];
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
expect(typeof capturedIcsString).toBe('string');
|
|
expect((capturedIcsString as string).startsWith('BEGIN:VCALENDAR')).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(capturedIcsString).toContain('SUMMARY:Lunch');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('update row: icsString passed to updateCalendarEvent starts with BEGIN:VCALENDAR', async () => {
|
|
const { updateCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
let capturedIcsString: unknown = null;
|
|
vi.mocked(updateCalendarEvent).mockImplementation(async (_client, _url, icsString, _etag) => {
|
|
capturedIcsString = icsString;
|
|
return makeResponse(204);
|
|
});
|
|
mockPendingRows = [
|
|
makeRow({
|
|
operation: 'update',
|
|
calendarObjectUrl: 'https://caldav.fastmail.com/dav/calendars/user/test/uid.ics',
|
|
}),
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
expect(typeof capturedIcsString).toBe('string');
|
|
expect((capturedIcsString as string).startsWith('BEGIN:VCALENDAR')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('create row with unparseable payload marks the row failed (hard fail, no retry)', async () => {
|
|
mockPendingRows = [makeRow({ payload: 'NOT_VALID_JSON{{{' })];
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
const setArg = mockUpdateSet.mock.calls[0]?.[0] as { status?: string };
|
|
expect(setArg?.status).toBe('failed');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// IN-03 (iteration 2): a JSON-parseable but schema-INVALID payload (e.g. missing the
|
|
// required title) can never produce a valid VEVENT, so the row is hard-failed (no
|
|
// retry) rather than dispatched with SUMMARY:undefined.
|
|
it('IN-03: create row with schema-invalid payload (missing title) is hard-failed, never dispatched', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockResolvedValue(makeResponse(201));
|
|
// Valid JSON, but title is missing → fails outboxPayloadSchema
|
|
const badPayload = JSON.stringify({
|
|
allDay: false,
|
|
start: '2026-06-10T12:00:00',
|
|
end: '2026-06-10T13:00:00',
|
|
});
|
|
mockPendingRows = [makeRow({ payload: badPayload })];
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
// Must NOT have dispatched a CalDAV write with an invalid VEVENT
|
|
expect(createCalendarEvent).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
const setArg = mockUpdateSet.mock.calls[0]?.[0] as { status?: string; lastError?: string };
|
|
expect(setArg?.status).toBe('failed');
|
|
expect(setArg?.lastError).toMatch(/validation/i);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// CR-01 (iteration 2): the edit-as-move create branch must re-apply the RRULE the
|
|
// route stashed on the payload as `_preservedRrule`, so a moved recurring series keeps
|
|
// its RRULE instead of collapsing into a single occurrence.
|
|
it('CR-01: create row re-applies _preservedRrule → emitted ICS contains RRULE:', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
let capturedIcsString: unknown = null;
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockImplementation(async (_client, _cal, _uid, icsString) => {
|
|
capturedIcsString = icsString;
|
|
return makeResponse(201);
|
|
});
|
|
// Move payload: no explicit `recurrence`, but the route stashed the source RRULE.
|
|
const movePayload = JSON.stringify({
|
|
title: 'Moved weekly standup',
|
|
allDay: false,
|
|
start: '2026-06-10T12:00:00',
|
|
end: '2026-06-10T13:00:00',
|
|
_preservedRrule: 'FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=MO',
|
|
});
|
|
mockPendingRows = [
|
|
makeRow({ operation: 'create', payload: movePayload, groupId: 'move-grp-1' }),
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
expect(typeof capturedIcsString).toBe('string');
|
|
expect(capturedIcsString as string).toContain('RRULE:');
|
|
expect(capturedIcsString as string).toContain('FREQ=WEEKLY');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// CR-01 corollary: an explicit `recurrence` on a create still wins over any preserved
|
|
// RRULE (deliberate user choice); recurrence:'none' must emit no RRULE.
|
|
it("CR-01: explicit recurrence:'none' wins → emitted ICS has no RRULE even if _preservedRrule present", async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
let capturedIcsString: unknown = null;
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockImplementation(async (_client, _cal, _uid, icsString) => {
|
|
capturedIcsString = icsString;
|
|
return makeResponse(201);
|
|
});
|
|
const payload = JSON.stringify({
|
|
title: 'One-off',
|
|
allDay: false,
|
|
start: '2026-06-10T12:00:00',
|
|
end: '2026-06-10T13:00:00',
|
|
recurrence: 'none',
|
|
_preservedRrule: 'FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=MO',
|
|
});
|
|
mockPendingRows = [makeRow({ operation: 'create', payload })];
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
expect(typeof capturedIcsString).toBe('string');
|
|
expect(capturedIcsString as string).not.toContain('RRULE:');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('runOutboxDrain — edit-as-move ordering (D-04)', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
|
mockPendingRows = [];
|
|
wireMockChain();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('processes the create row BEFORE the delete row when both share a groupId', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent, deleteCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
const createResponse = makeResponse(201);
|
|
const deleteResponse = makeResponse(204);
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockResolvedValue(createResponse);
|
|
vi.mocked(deleteCalendarEvent).mockResolvedValue(deleteResponse);
|
|
|
|
const groupId = 'edit-move-group-001';
|
|
// delete row listed first (to verify ordering is enforced regardless of order in the array)
|
|
const deleteRow = makeRow({
|
|
id: 2,
|
|
operation: 'delete',
|
|
calendarObjectUrl: 'https://caldav.fastmail.com/dav/calendars/user/test/Old/uid.ics',
|
|
etag: '"etag-old"',
|
|
payload: null,
|
|
groupId,
|
|
});
|
|
const createRow = makeRow({
|
|
id: 3,
|
|
operation: 'create',
|
|
calendarUrl: 'https://caldav.fastmail.com/dav/calendars/user/test/New/',
|
|
groupId,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Both rows in the pending list
|
|
mockPendingRows = [deleteRow, createRow];
|
|
|
|
// The durable sibling-status check (CR-04) runs for the delete row with groupId.
|
|
// It queries calendarOutbox for the sibling create's status. By the time the delete
|
|
// is processed (create was sorted and dispatched first), we simulate the sibling as 'done'.
|
|
// The base mockWherePending returns mockPendingRows for all calendarOutbox selects; we
|
|
// override just the sibling-status call with mockImplementationOnce queued after the
|
|
// pending-rows select call.
|
|
mockWherePending
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.resolve([deleteRow, createRow])) // pending-rows select
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.resolve([{ status: 'done' }])); // sibling-status select
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
// CREATE must be called before DELETE
|
|
const createCall = vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mock.invocationCallOrder[0];
|
|
const deleteCall = vi.mocked(deleteCalendarEvent).mock.invocationCallOrder[0];
|
|
|
|
// If either was never called, the test will fail naturally.
|
|
// If create order index > delete order index, create ran AFTER delete — fail.
|
|
expect(createCall).toBeLessThan(deleteCall);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('runOutboxDrain — durable create-before-delete (CR-04) + concurrency guard (CR-05)', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
|
mockPendingRows = [];
|
|
wireMockChain();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('CR-04 cross-batch: drain 1 (sibling create still pending) leaves the delete pending and never calls deleteCalendarEvent', async () => {
|
|
const { deleteCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
vi.mocked(deleteCalendarEvent).mockResolvedValue(makeResponse(204));
|
|
|
|
const groupId = 'edit-move-group-001';
|
|
const deleteRow = makeRow({
|
|
id: 2,
|
|
operation: 'delete',
|
|
calendarObjectUrl: 'https://caldav.fastmail.com/dav/calendars/user/test/Old/uid.ics',
|
|
etag: '"etag-old"',
|
|
payload: null,
|
|
groupId,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Drain 1: only the delete row is returned as pending (the create hasn't been fetched yet)
|
|
// First mockWherePending call → pending-rows select (only the delete row)
|
|
// Second mockWherePending call → sibling-status select (create is still 'pending')
|
|
mockWherePending
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.resolve([deleteRow]))
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.resolve([{ status: 'pending' }]));
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
// The delete must NOT have been dispatched — sibling create is not yet done
|
|
expect(deleteCalendarEvent).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
|
|
// The delete row's status must NOT have been updated to done or failed
|
|
const statusCalls = mockUpdateSet.mock.calls.filter((call) => {
|
|
const arg = call[0] as { status?: string };
|
|
return arg?.status === 'done' || arg?.status === 'failed';
|
|
});
|
|
expect(statusCalls.length).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('CR-04 cross-batch: drain 2 (sibling create now done) dispatches the delete exactly once', async () => {
|
|
const { deleteCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
vi.mocked(deleteCalendarEvent).mockResolvedValue(makeResponse(204));
|
|
|
|
const groupId = 'edit-move-group-001';
|
|
const deleteRow = makeRow({
|
|
id: 2,
|
|
operation: 'delete',
|
|
calendarObjectUrl: 'https://caldav.fastmail.com/dav/calendars/user/test/Old/uid.ics',
|
|
etag: '"etag-old"',
|
|
payload: null,
|
|
groupId,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Drain 2: delete row is pending again, sibling create is now 'done'
|
|
mockWherePending
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.resolve([deleteRow]))
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.resolve([{ status: 'done' }]));
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
expect(deleteCalendarEvent).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('CR-04 paired-create-failed: if sibling create is failed, delete is marked failed and never dispatched (D-04 preserved)', async () => {
|
|
const { deleteCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
vi.mocked(deleteCalendarEvent).mockResolvedValue(makeResponse(204));
|
|
|
|
const groupId = 'edit-move-group-001';
|
|
const deleteRow = makeRow({
|
|
id: 2,
|
|
operation: 'delete',
|
|
calendarObjectUrl: 'https://caldav.fastmail.com/dav/calendars/user/test/Old/uid.ics',
|
|
etag: '"etag-old"',
|
|
payload: null,
|
|
groupId,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Sibling create is 'failed' — the delete must be permanently skipped
|
|
mockWherePending
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.resolve([deleteRow]))
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.resolve([{ status: 'failed' }]));
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
// The original event must be preserved — delete must NOT be dispatched
|
|
expect(deleteCalendarEvent).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
|
|
// The delete row must be marked failed (permanently, not just skipped this cycle)
|
|
const failedCall = mockUpdateSet.mock.calls.find((call) => {
|
|
const arg = call[0] as { status?: string; lastError?: string };
|
|
return arg?.status === 'failed' && typeof arg?.lastError === 'string';
|
|
});
|
|
expect(failedCall).toBeDefined();
|
|
const failArg = failedCall![0] as { lastError: string };
|
|
expect(failArg.lastError).toMatch(/paired create/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('CR-05: two overlapping runOutboxDrain calls invoke createCalendarEvent exactly once', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
// Simulate a slow create so the second drain starts while first is still running
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockImplementation(
|
|
() => new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(() => resolve(makeResponse(201)), 20)),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
mockPendingRows = [makeRow({ id: 1 })];
|
|
|
|
// Start both drains concurrently WITHOUT awaiting the first
|
|
const drain1 = runOutboxDrain();
|
|
const drain2 = runOutboxDrain();
|
|
await Promise.all([drain1, drain2]);
|
|
|
|
// Only one dispatch must have happened — the second drain must have been a no-op
|
|
expect(createCalendarEvent).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('runOutboxDrain — fresh etag re-read before PUT (WR-02)', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
// Use resetAllMocks here (not clearAllMocks) so that unconsumed mockImplementationOnce
|
|
// queues from prior tests do not bleed into subsequent tests via the shared mockWherePending.
|
|
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
|
mockPendingRows = [];
|
|
wireMockChain();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('WR-02 fresh etag: update PUT uses freshest calendarEvents.etag, not stale enqueue-time etag', async () => {
|
|
const { updateCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
let capturedEtag: string | null = null;
|
|
vi.mocked(updateCalendarEvent).mockImplementation(async (_client, _url, _ics, etag) => {
|
|
capturedEtag = etag;
|
|
return makeResponse(204);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const updateRow = makeRow({
|
|
operation: 'update',
|
|
calendarObjectUrl: 'https://caldav.fastmail.com/dav/calendars/user/test/uid.ics',
|
|
etag: 'old-etag', // stale enqueue-time etag
|
|
});
|
|
mockPendingRows = [updateRow];
|
|
|
|
// Mock the calendarEvents etag lookup to return a fresher etag.
|
|
// In RED (no fresh-etag code yet), mockWhereCalEvents is never called, so
|
|
// the PUT uses row.etag = 'old-etag'. The assertion expects 'new-etag' → fails RED.
|
|
mockWhereCalEvents.mockResolvedValue([{ etag: 'new-etag' }]);
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
// The PUT must use the freshest etag from calendarEvents, not the stale row.etag
|
|
expect(capturedEtag).toBe('new-etag');
|
|
expect(capturedEtag).not.toBe('old-etag');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('WR-02 etag fallback: update PUT falls back to row.etag when calendarEvents has no matching row', async () => {
|
|
const { updateCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
let capturedEtag: string | null = null;
|
|
vi.mocked(updateCalendarEvent).mockImplementation(async (_client, _url, _ics, etag) => {
|
|
capturedEtag = etag;
|
|
return makeResponse(204);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const updateRow = makeRow({
|
|
operation: 'update',
|
|
calendarObjectUrl: 'https://caldav.fastmail.com/dav/calendars/user/test/uid.ics',
|
|
etag: 'fallback-etag',
|
|
});
|
|
mockPendingRows = [updateRow];
|
|
|
|
// mockWhereCalEvents is already configured to return [] by default in wireMockChain.
|
|
// No row for the uid → worker falls back to row.etag.
|
|
// In RED, mockWhereCalEvents is never called so the test passes (row.etag used directly).
|
|
// In GREEN, mockWhereCalEvents returns [] so the fallback is exercised.
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
// When calendarEvents has no row for the uid, fall back to row.etag
|
|
expect(capturedEtag).toBe('fallback-etag');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('runOutboxDrain — fail closed on bad credentials (CR-03) + backoff index fix (WR-01)', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
|
mockPendingRows = [];
|
|
wireMockChain();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('CR-03: credential-load failure leaves row pending and never calls createFastmailClient with empty credentials', async () => {
|
|
// Make decryptPassword throw so loadClientForUser throws
|
|
mockDecryptPassword.mockImplementation(() => {
|
|
throw new Error('bad credentials');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const { createFastmailClient } = await import('../../src/broker/client.js');
|
|
mockPendingRows = [makeRow()];
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
// The row must NOT be updated to done/failed/dead — it stays pending (outer catch handles it)
|
|
const updateCalls = mockUpdateSet.mock.calls;
|
|
const anyStatusChange = updateCalls.some((call) => {
|
|
const arg = call[0] as { status?: string };
|
|
return arg?.status !== undefined;
|
|
});
|
|
expect(anyStatusChange).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
// createFastmailClient must NEVER be called with empty-string credentials
|
|
const emptyCalls = vi
|
|
.mocked(createFastmailClient)
|
|
.mock.calls.filter(([email, password]) => email === '' || password === '');
|
|
expect(emptyCalls.length).toBe(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('WR-01: first transient failure (attemptCount=0) sets backoff to ~15s (BACKOFF_SECONDS[0])', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockResolvedValue(makeResponse(500));
|
|
const row = makeRow({ attemptCount: 0 });
|
|
mockPendingRows = [row];
|
|
|
|
const beforeDrain = Date.now();
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
const afterDrain = Date.now();
|
|
|
|
const setArg = mockUpdateSet.mock.calls[0]?.[0] as {
|
|
nextAttemptAt?: Date;
|
|
attemptCount?: number;
|
|
};
|
|
expect(setArg?.attemptCount).toBe(1);
|
|
|
|
// WR-01: nextAttemptAt must be ~15s in the future (BACKOFF_SECONDS[0] = 15)
|
|
// Allow ±2s for execution overhead
|
|
const expectedMinMs = beforeDrain + 14_000;
|
|
const expectedMaxMs = afterDrain + 16_000;
|
|
expect(setArg?.nextAttemptAt?.getTime()).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(expectedMinMs);
|
|
expect(setArg?.nextAttemptAt?.getTime()).toBeLessThanOrEqual(expectedMaxMs);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── D-06: assembleRruleString unit tests ─────────────────────────────────────
|
|
// Exercise the exported `assembleRruleString` helper.
|
|
|
|
describe('assembleRruleString (D-06)', () => {
|
|
it('returns base preset unchanged when no bound given', () => {
|
|
expect(assembleRruleString('FREQ=DAILY')).toBe('FREQ=DAILY');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('appends COUNT when count is given (count wins over until)', () => {
|
|
expect(assembleRruleString('FREQ=DAILY', undefined, 5, false)).toBe('FREQ=DAILY;COUNT=5');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('COUNT wins when both until and count are provided (mutual exclusion, RFC 5545 §3.3.10)', () => {
|
|
expect(assembleRruleString('FREQ=WEEKLY', '2026-06-30', 5, false)).toBe('FREQ=WEEKLY;COUNT=5');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('appends UNTIL as DATE form (YYYYMMDD) for all-day events', () => {
|
|
expect(assembleRruleString('FREQ=WEEKLY', '2026-06-30', undefined, true)).toBe(
|
|
'FREQ=WEEKLY;UNTIL=20260630',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('appends UNTIL as DATETIME UTC form (YYYYMMDDTHHMMSSZ) for timed events', () => {
|
|
expect(assembleRruleString('FREQ=WEEKLY', '2026-06-30', undefined, false)).toBe(
|
|
'FREQ=WEEKLY;UNTIL=20260630T235959Z',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('COUNT=5 appended to FREQ=DAILY (matches plan behavior assertion)', () => {
|
|
expect(assembleRruleString('FREQ=DAILY', undefined, 5, false)).toBe('FREQ=DAILY;COUNT=5');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── D-07: FREQ-persistence regression lock ────────────────────────────────────
|
|
// The FREQ-persistence assertion catches the D-07 regression scenario
|
|
// (recurrenceUntil/recurrenceCount wiring must not drop the FREQ).
|
|
|
|
describe('FREQ persistence (D-07 regression)', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
|
mockPendingRows = [];
|
|
wireMockChain();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('D-07: daily-recurrence payload assembles to FREQ=DAILY (not weekly or none) in emitted ICS', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
let capturedIcsString: unknown = null;
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockImplementation(async (_client, _cal, _uid, icsString) => {
|
|
capturedIcsString = icsString;
|
|
return makeResponse(201);
|
|
});
|
|
const dailyPayload = JSON.stringify({
|
|
title: 'Daily standup',
|
|
allDay: false,
|
|
start: '2026-06-10T09:00:00',
|
|
end: '2026-06-10T09:30:00',
|
|
recurrence: 'daily',
|
|
});
|
|
mockPendingRows = [makeRow({ payload: dailyPayload })];
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
expect(typeof capturedIcsString).toBe('string');
|
|
// D-07: FREQ must be DAILY — not WEEKLY or absent
|
|
expect(capturedIcsString as string).toContain('RRULE:FREQ=DAILY');
|
|
expect(capturedIcsString as string).not.toContain('FREQ=WEEKLY');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── scheduleOutboxDrain trigger-wiring tests (D-09) ─────────────────────────
|
|
// These tests verify the trigger-wiring behavior introduced in Plan 09-01:
|
|
// SC-1: signalOutboxDrain() → drain fires promptly (no 15s wait)
|
|
// D-05: mid-drain signal collapses to exactly one trailing re-drain
|
|
// D-07: concurrent scheduleOutboxDrain() calls dispatch each row exactly once
|
|
|
|
describe('scheduleOutboxDrain — trigger wiring (D-09)', () => {
|
|
// Wire the EventEmitter signal → scheduleOutboxDrain once for this describe block.
|
|
// initOutboxTrigger registers the 'drain' listener that connects signalOutboxDrain()
|
|
// to scheduleOutboxDrain(). Called once (not per-test) to avoid listener accumulation.
|
|
beforeAll(() => {
|
|
initOutboxTrigger();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// WR-03: remove the leaked 'drain' listener so it cannot fire against the mocked
|
|
// DB in subsequent describe blocks (fileParallelism:false shares one module instance).
|
|
afterAll(() => {
|
|
stopOutboxTrigger();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
|
// WR-03 / IN-03: module-level isDraining/drainRequested are not reset by
|
|
// vi.resetAllMocks(); reset them explicitly so each test starts quiescent
|
|
// instead of relying on the previous test having drained cleanly.
|
|
__resetDrainState();
|
|
mockPendingRows = [];
|
|
wireMockChain();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Test A (SC-1): signalOutboxDrain() triggers a drain immediately — no 15s wait.
|
|
// With one pending row and createCalendarEvent mocked to 201, calling signalOutboxDrain()
|
|
// then flushing microtasks results in createCalendarEvent called exactly once.
|
|
// No vi.useFakeTimers() — drain fires via the EventEmitter signal, not the interval.
|
|
it('SC-1: signalOutboxDrain() triggers drain promptly — createCalendarEvent called once without advancing timers', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockResolvedValue(makeResponse(201));
|
|
mockPendingRows = [makeRow()];
|
|
|
|
signalOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
// Flush microtasks so the async drain has a chance to run
|
|
await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setImmediate(resolve));
|
|
// One more flush to let the drain's internal async steps complete
|
|
await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setImmediate(resolve));
|
|
|
|
expect(createCalendarEvent).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Test B (SC-4 / D-05): a signal arriving during an in-flight drain triggers exactly
|
|
// one trailing re-drain — not two, not zero.
|
|
it('D-05: two signals mid-drain collapse to exactly one trailing re-drain', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
|
|
// Capture the resolve function so we can hold the first drain in flight
|
|
let resolveFirst!: () => void;
|
|
const firstDone = new Promise<void>((resolve) => {
|
|
resolveFirst = resolve;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// First call: held until we release it; subsequent calls resolve immediately
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent)
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(async () => {
|
|
await firstDone;
|
|
return makeResponse(201);
|
|
})
|
|
.mockResolvedValue(makeResponse(201));
|
|
|
|
// Two pending rows: drain 1 picks up row 1, trailing drain picks up row 2
|
|
const row1 = makeRow({ id: 1, uid: 'uid-1@familysync' });
|
|
const row2 = makeRow({ id: 2, uid: 'uid-2@familysync' });
|
|
mockPendingRows = [row1];
|
|
|
|
// Start drain 1 (via signal) — it blocks on firstDone
|
|
signalOutboxDrain();
|
|
await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setImmediate(resolve));
|
|
|
|
// While drain 1 is in flight, send two more signals — both should collapse to one trailing drain
|
|
mockPendingRows = [row2];
|
|
signalOutboxDrain();
|
|
signalOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
// Release drain 1 — this lets it finish, then the trailing re-drain fires
|
|
resolveFirst();
|
|
|
|
// Flush: drain 1 finally-block + trailing scheduleOutboxDrain() + trailing drain steps
|
|
await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setImmediate(resolve));
|
|
await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setImmediate(resolve));
|
|
await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setImmediate(resolve));
|
|
|
|
// Drain 1 called createCalendarEvent once (row1); trailing drain called it once (row2).
|
|
// Total = 2 — never a third pass.
|
|
expect(createCalendarEvent).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Test C (SC-4 / D-07): two concurrent scheduleOutboxDrain() calls dispatch each row
|
|
// exactly once — the second call is a no-op via the isDraining guard.
|
|
// The trailing re-drain (triggered by drainRequested) finds 0 pending rows so
|
|
// createCalendarEvent is called exactly once total.
|
|
it('D-07: two concurrent scheduleOutboxDrain() calls invoke createCalendarEvent exactly once', async () => {
|
|
vi.useFakeTimers();
|
|
try {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
// Slow create so the second scheduleOutboxDrain starts while first is still running
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockImplementation(
|
|
() => new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(() => resolve(makeResponse(201)), 20)),
|
|
);
|
|
const row = makeRow({ id: 1 });
|
|
// First pending-rows query returns the row; subsequent queries return empty
|
|
// (simulates: drain 1 processes and removes the row; trailing drain finds nothing)
|
|
mockWherePending
|
|
.mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.resolve([row]))
|
|
.mockImplementation(() => Promise.resolve([]));
|
|
|
|
// Both calls are synchronous — second sees isDraining=true and sets drainRequested=true
|
|
scheduleOutboxDrain();
|
|
scheduleOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
await vi.runAllTimersAsync();
|
|
|
|
// Drain 1 dispatched the row once; trailing drain found 0 rows → createCalendarEvent once total
|
|
expect(createCalendarEvent).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
vi.useRealTimers();
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Phase 11 Plan 03: reminderLeadMinutes schema + VALARM wiring ───────────────
|
|
// CAL-13: reminderLeadMinutes round-trips end-to-end through outbox payload →
|
|
// buildVeventString → emitted ICS.
|
|
// CAL-14: UPDATE row with no reminderLeadMinutes in payload preserves existing
|
|
// VALARM verbatim from rawVevent (mirrors WR-01 _preservedRrule pattern).
|
|
|
|
describe('runOutboxDrain — reminderLeadMinutes VALARM wiring (CAL-13/CAL-14, Phase 11 Plan 03)', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetAllMocks();
|
|
mockPendingRows = [];
|
|
wireMockChain();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// CAL-14: UPDATE row with NO reminderLeadMinutes field, but rawVevent has a VALARM →
|
|
// emitted ICS must still contain BEGIN:VALARM (preserve path, mirrors _preservedRrule WR-01).
|
|
it('CAL-14 preserve: UPDATE with no reminderLeadMinutes field preserves existing VALARM from rawVevent', async () => {
|
|
const { updateCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
let capturedIcsString: unknown = null;
|
|
vi.mocked(updateCalendarEvent).mockImplementation(async (_client, _url, icsString, _etag) => {
|
|
capturedIcsString = icsString;
|
|
return makeResponse(204);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// rawVevent that already has a VALARM (TRIGGER:-PT30M)
|
|
const rawVeventWithValarm = [
|
|
'BEGIN:VCALENDAR',
|
|
'VERSION:2.0',
|
|
'BEGIN:VEVENT',
|
|
'UID:test-uid@familysync',
|
|
'SUMMARY:Team meeting',
|
|
'DTSTART:20260610T120000Z',
|
|
'DTEND:20260610T130000Z',
|
|
'BEGIN:VALARM',
|
|
'ACTION:DISPLAY',
|
|
'DESCRIPTION:Reminder',
|
|
'TRIGGER:-PT30M',
|
|
'END:VALARM',
|
|
'END:VEVENT',
|
|
'END:VCALENDAR',
|
|
].join('\r\n');
|
|
|
|
// Payload has NO reminderLeadMinutes key (absent = no-change, D-08)
|
|
const updatePayload = JSON.stringify({
|
|
title: 'Team meeting',
|
|
allDay: false,
|
|
start: '2026-06-10T12:00:00.000Z',
|
|
end: '2026-06-10T13:00:00.000Z',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
mockPendingRows = [
|
|
makeRow({
|
|
operation: 'update',
|
|
calendarObjectUrl: 'https://caldav.fastmail.com/dav/calendars/user/test/uid.ics',
|
|
payload: updatePayload,
|
|
}),
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
// Simulate freshEtagRows returning rawVevent that has a VALARM
|
|
mockWhereCalEvents.mockResolvedValue([{ etag: '"fresh"', rawVevent: rawVeventWithValarm }]);
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
expect(typeof capturedIcsString).toBe('string');
|
|
// The emitted ICS must contain the preserved VALARM
|
|
expect(capturedIcsString as string).toContain('BEGIN:VALARM');
|
|
expect(capturedIcsString as string).toContain('TRIGGER:-PT30M');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// CAL-13: CREATE row with reminderLeadMinutes=15 → emitted ICS contains TRIGGER:-PT15M
|
|
it('CAL-13 timed: CREATE row with reminderLeadMinutes=15 emits TRIGGER:-PT15M', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
let capturedIcsString: unknown = null;
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockImplementation(async (_client, _cal, _uid, icsString) => {
|
|
capturedIcsString = icsString;
|
|
return makeResponse(201);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const payload = JSON.stringify({
|
|
title: 'Doctor appointment',
|
|
allDay: false,
|
|
start: '2026-06-15T14:00:00.000Z',
|
|
end: '2026-06-15T15:00:00.000Z',
|
|
reminderLeadMinutes: 15,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
mockPendingRows = [makeRow({ payload })];
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
expect(typeof capturedIcsString).toBe('string');
|
|
expect(capturedIcsString as string).toContain('BEGIN:VALARM');
|
|
expect(capturedIcsString as string).toContain('TRIGGER:-PT15M');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// CAL-13 clear: UPDATE row with reminderLeadMinutes=null → emitted ICS has no VALARM
|
|
it('CAL-13 clear: UPDATE row with reminderLeadMinutes=null emits no VALARM (explicit clear)', async () => {
|
|
const { updateCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
let capturedIcsString: unknown = null;
|
|
vi.mocked(updateCalendarEvent).mockImplementation(async (_client, _url, icsString, _etag) => {
|
|
capturedIcsString = icsString;
|
|
return makeResponse(204);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const updatePayload = JSON.stringify({
|
|
title: 'No reminder event',
|
|
allDay: false,
|
|
start: '2026-06-15T14:00:00.000Z',
|
|
end: '2026-06-15T15:00:00.000Z',
|
|
reminderLeadMinutes: null,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
mockPendingRows = [
|
|
makeRow({
|
|
operation: 'update',
|
|
calendarObjectUrl: 'https://caldav.fastmail.com/dav/calendars/user/test/uid.ics',
|
|
payload: updatePayload,
|
|
}),
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
expect(typeof capturedIcsString).toBe('string');
|
|
expect(capturedIcsString as string).not.toContain('BEGIN:VALARM');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// CAL-13 all-day: CREATE row with allDay=true and reminderLeadMinutes=1440 →
|
|
// emitted ICS contains VALUE=DATE-TIME absolute trigger (not DURATION trigger).
|
|
it('CAL-13 all-day: CREATE row with allDay=true and reminderLeadMinutes=1440 emits VALUE=DATE-TIME trigger', async () => {
|
|
const { createCalendarEvent } = await import('../../src/broker/write.js');
|
|
let capturedIcsString: unknown = null;
|
|
vi.mocked(createCalendarEvent).mockImplementation(async (_client, _cal, _uid, icsString) => {
|
|
capturedIcsString = icsString;
|
|
return makeResponse(201);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const payload = JSON.stringify({
|
|
title: 'Birthday party',
|
|
allDay: true,
|
|
start: '2026-06-20',
|
|
end: '2026-06-20',
|
|
reminderLeadMinutes: 1440, // 1 day before = leadDays = 1440/1440 = 1
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
mockPendingRows = [makeRow({ payload })];
|
|
|
|
await runOutboxDrain();
|
|
|
|
expect(typeof capturedIcsString).toBe('string');
|
|
expect(capturedIcsString as string).toContain('BEGIN:VALARM');
|
|
// Must use VALUE=DATE-TIME absolute trigger for all-day (not DURATION)
|
|
expect(capturedIcsString as string).toContain('VALUE=DATE-TIME');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|