wip: 10.1 paused at verification decision point
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Lucas Berger
@@ -1,62 +1,69 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
phase: 10.1-aggressive-workflow-modularization
|
||||
task: 0
|
||||
total_tasks: 0
|
||||
status: context_gathered
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-02-04
|
||||
task: complete
|
||||
total_tasks: 5
|
||||
status: verification_complete_gaps_found
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-02-05
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<current_state>
|
||||
Phase 10.1 context discussion completed. CONTEXT.md created with implementation decisions. Phase has no plans yet — ready for `/gsd:plan-phase 10.1` to create execution plans.
|
||||
Phase 10.1 execution complete. All 5 plans executed successfully. Verification found 13/16 must-haves verified with 3 gaps. User needs to decide whether to close gaps or move to next phase.
|
||||
</current_state>
|
||||
|
||||
<completed_work>
|
||||
- Phase 10 fully complete (7 plans, all UAT gaps closed)
|
||||
- Phase 10.1 CONTEXT.md created via `/gsd:discuss-phase`
|
||||
- Fixed misnamed phase directories (10.1 and 10.2 were swapped)
|
||||
- Committed: `docs(10.1): capture phase context`
|
||||
|
||||
- Plan 10.1-01: Foundation and Domain Analysis - Complete
|
||||
- Plan 10.1-02: Batch UI Sub-workflow - Complete (16 nodes extracted)
|
||||
- Plan 10.1-03: Container Status Sub-workflow - Complete (11 nodes extracted)
|
||||
- Plan 10.1-04: Confirmation Sub-workflow - Complete (16 nodes extracted)
|
||||
- Plan 10.1-05: Integration Verification & UAT - Complete (10 bug fixes)
|
||||
- SUMMARY created for 10.1-05 (was missing, created this session)
|
||||
- VERIFICATION.md created by verifier
|
||||
</completed_work>
|
||||
|
||||
<remaining_work>
|
||||
- Run `/gsd:plan-phase 10.1` to create execution plans
|
||||
- Execute plans to decompose main workflow from 192 nodes to ~50-80 nodes
|
||||
- Create domain sub-workflows per the captured decisions
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision point:** User must choose path forward:
|
||||
|
||||
Option A: Close gaps
|
||||
- Run `/gsd:plan-phase 10.1 --gaps` to create plans for remaining node reduction
|
||||
- Target: reduce from 168 to 115-125 nodes
|
||||
- Would extract Matching/Disambiguation domain (~15 nodes)
|
||||
|
||||
Option B: Accept current state
|
||||
- 13/16 verified is strong
|
||||
- Move to Phase 10.2 (Better Logging) or Phase 11 (Update All)
|
||||
- Current 168 nodes is 12.5% reduction from 192 starting point
|
||||
</remaining_work>
|
||||
|
||||
<decisions_made>
|
||||
**Decomposition:**
|
||||
- Claude proposes optimal boundaries, user approves
|
||||
- Extraction threshold: cohesive behavior + 8-15 nodes minimum
|
||||
- Existing sub-workflows (Update, Actions, Logs) open to restructuring
|
||||
|
||||
**Main workflow:**
|
||||
- Main sends all Telegram responses (sub-workflows return data only)
|
||||
- Centralized error handling in main
|
||||
- Claude to evaluate whether dedicated Telegram sub-workflow adds value
|
||||
|
||||
**Contracts:**
|
||||
- Input: common fields (chatId, messageId) + domain-specific
|
||||
- File naming: `n8n-{domain}.json` (rename existing to match)
|
||||
|
||||
**Migration:**
|
||||
- Grouped extraction, verify each group
|
||||
- Telegram sub-workflow first if validated
|
||||
- Git + backup files for rollback
|
||||
- Original 50-80 node target was unrealistic (58 Telegram + 22 infrastructure = 80 baseline)
|
||||
- Revised target to 115-125 nodes based on analysis
|
||||
- Achieved 168 nodes (24 node reduction, -12.5%)
|
||||
- All 6 sub-workflows deployed and operational
|
||||
- Extensive UAT completed with 10 bug fixes
|
||||
</decisions_made>
|
||||
|
||||
<blockers>
|
||||
None
|
||||
None - awaiting user decision on gap closure vs. moving forward
|
||||
</blockers>
|
||||
|
||||
<context>
|
||||
User wants pragmatic modularization — no workflow too large to work with, logical groupings, don't over-engineer. Key insight from discussion: a dedicated Telegram sub-workflow could centralize all messaging complexity (sending, editing, keyboards, errors, callbacks). This needs validation during research/planning.
|
||||
Phase 10.1 achieved its core objectives (modularization, sub-workflow extraction) but missed the node count target. The verifier flagged 3 gaps:
|
||||
|
||||
The goal is main workflow becomes: trigger → auth → route → dispatch to sub-workflows → format response → send via Telegram (or Telegram sub-workflow).
|
||||
1. Node count 168 vs 115-125 target
|
||||
2. 62 Code nodes in main (some may be extractable)
|
||||
3. Input/output contracts not formally documented
|
||||
|
||||
The missing 43+ node reduction would require extracting Matching/Disambiguation domain which was scoped as optional during planning.
|
||||
|
||||
All functionality is working. The question is whether perfection (hitting node target) is worth the effort vs. moving to more valuable features.
|
||||
</context>
|
||||
|
||||
<next_action>
|
||||
Run `/gsd:plan-phase 10.1` to:
|
||||
1. Research current workflow structure
|
||||
2. Propose domain boundaries (including Telegram sub-workflow evaluation)
|
||||
3. Create execution plans for grouped extraction
|
||||
Ask user: "Close gaps with `/gsd:plan-phase 10.1 --gaps` or move forward with `/gsd:plan-phase 10.2` or `/gsd:plan-phase 11`?"
|
||||
|
||||
If closing gaps: Run plan-phase with --gaps flag to create additional extraction plans
|
||||
If moving forward: Plan the next phase (10.2 logging improvements or 11 update-all feature)
|
||||
</next_action>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user